Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in dogs undergoing emergency abdominal surgery
Author(s)
Fages Cárceles, AidaDate
2022-06-06Discipline
VeterinariaKeyword(s)
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)Pathophysiology
Major surgery
Emergency abdominal surgery
Dogs
Abstract
Emergency abdominal surgery carries high morbidity and mortality rates in people and is
has been an ideal focus for quality improvement programs implementation. However,
there is less evidence characterising the outcome of these surgeries as a single group in
dogs.
Enhance Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been largely applied in human
medicine to reduce morbidity and mortality of several surgical procedures. ERAS
protocols highlight the importance of establishing a specific pathway for the patients
focusing on preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative components which
comprehend a multidisciplinary approach. Reports of use of these protocols in emergency
veterinary surgery are absent but the first indication to build a specific ERAS protocol is
to individuate the critical points of the procedure in order to act on them to ameliorate the
outcome.
This study aimed to characterise the clinical course, associated complications and
outcome of dogs undergoing emergency abdominal surgery and to create a specific ERAS
program to decrease mortality and postoperative complications in this population.
The first part of the study consists in a retrospective study of dogs that underwent
emergency abdominal surgery in two institutions. Logistic regression analysis was
performed to identify variables correlated with death and complication Then, a multidisciplinary team was created, and a perioperative program for optimizing the
management of these patients was developed. The second part of the study consist in a
prospective study with the implementation of the program in this population of dogs in
the same institutions. Patients of the retrospective study were classified as control group
and cases from the prospective study after the protocol implementation were classified as
ERAS group. The comparison of variables between groups was performed using Fisher's
exact test and the results were reported as Odd Ratio (OR).
Eighty-two dogs were included in the first part of the study (control group). The most
common reason for surgery was a gastrointestinal foreign body. Overall, the 15-day
mortality rate was 20.7% (17/82). The median (range) length of hospitalization was 3
(0.5–15) days. Of the 82 patients, 24 (29.3%) developed major complications and 66
(80.5%) developed minor complications. Perioperative factors significantly associated
with death included tachycardia (p < 0.001), hypothermia (p < 0.001), lactate acidosis (p
< 0.001), shock index > 1 (p < 0.001), leukopenia (p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (p
< 0.001) at admission, as well as intraoperative hypotension (p < 0.001) and perioperative
use of blood products (p < 0.001).
Fifty-nine patients were included in the ERAS group. Surgical procedures were different
between ERAS and control group and more patients in ERAS groups had lower
comorbidity index (CI). The rest of demographic and laboratory and physical
examination findings on arrival were similar between groups. Compared with control
group, ERAS group had reduced mortality (20.7% vs 5%, p = 0.01, OR 4.88) and
postoperative minor complications (80.5% vs 45.8%, p = 0.0001, OR 4.71). The overall
number of patients that did not experience postoperative complications was significantly
higher in the ERAS group compared with control group (45.8% vs 17%, p = 0.0003, OR 0.24). The rate of postoperative major complications and the overall length of hospital
stay was similar between groups. ERAS significantly improved use of locoregional
anaesthesia (p < 0.0001), antiemetic prophylaxis (p < 0.0001) and time from surgery to
start oral intake (p < 0.0001).
Implementation of this perioperative program and demonstration of improved outcomes
in two different hospitals provides evidence of external validity of the use of this approach
to reduce mortality and complications after emergency laparotomy in dogs. Further work
assessing the potential of selected program items in these patients are needed to identify
factors that may improve outcome.